cwd.cc home

 

 

May 16, 2002

 

TESTIMONY TO THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES

 

From: Charles H. Southwick, M.S., Ph.D.

Professor Emeritus, Environmental, Population and Organismic Biology

University of Colorado

Former Professor of Pathobiology

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

 

ELEVEN PRIMARY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE MANAGEMENT:

 

1. Present and recent control strategies of mass culling do not seem to be working. The

disease has spread despite extensive slaughter of both captive and wild deer and elk.

 

2. In several cases, the spread of the disease has been associated with increased culling.

Large-scale killing may contribute to spread by: (a) increasing movements and dispersal

of deer and elk, (b) massive destruction of healthy stock (often 99% of those killed),

some of which probably hold the key to genetic resistance that can lead us up and out of

this costly and dangerous epizootic.

 

3. Current culling methods have employed open transportation of heads and carcasses

which can spread contamination, and disposal in landfills which can contaminate soil for

at least three years. High temperature incineration must be employed, and more care in

collection and transportation.

 

4. Better methods of detection and surveillance must be developed. It is greatly

preferable to employ live testing such as tonsillar biopsies, even though this is more

expensive and requires more diligent personnel. Other live tests, such as urinalysis,

should be urgently developed.

 

5. In our own study area of mule deer just west of Boulder, Colorado, the Colorado

Division of Wildlife tested a dead deer 6 years ago which was CWD +. (They did not

inform us until March of 2002). Nonetheless, this deer population has thrived in the six

years since then. Fawn production has been very good, fawn survival and winter survival

have been excellent. This indicates either very low transmission in natural habitats (as

opposed to captivity), or else it indicates individuals or herds with natural genetic

resistance.

 

6. There are acute shortages of research on such basic topics as transmission and

infectivity rates in natural populations, genetic resistance in individuals in the PrP gene

locus, and in cross-species infectivity.

 

7. Captive herds and Game farms have been the major sources of CWD. It is essential

that they be controlled more carefully, all animals tested, all interstate shipments stopped,

and all captive stock subject to intense surveillance. Unless CWD can be eradicated from

game ranches, this industry should be closed down.

 

8. Eradication of CWD is not a feasible goal in wild populations. As in the cases of

Lyme disease, Hanta virus, rabies, and virtually all other zoonotic infections, we cannot

eradicate the infectious agent in natural populations. The best we can achieve is control.

The goal for CWD control in natural cervid populations is a prevalence or incidence of

less than 1 percent.

 

9. CWD must be treated as a national and international problem of great urgency.

Nationwide monitoring, control, and research programs must be instituted immediately.

International cooperation is necessary.

 

10. An international conference combining experts in wildlife ecology, prion disease

specialists, and public health scientists should be convened as soon as possible to

determine the best courses of action.

 

11. Expenditures now on research, increased surveillance by live testing, and a

national/international conference of appropriate scientists can save potential losses of

billions of dollars in future years.

 

Follow up address:

Dr. Charles Southwick

Department of Environmental, Population and Organismic (EPO) Biology

CU Box 334

University of Colorado

Boulder, CO 80309

Phone: 303-492-5468